Validation

8 May 2008, 10:06

Well, I just got news yesterday that I’ve received the big-ass fellowship I applied for (big-ass in terms of difficulty and prestige, I had to submit a budget so the money is pretty much just six months of Ghana living expenses, which is great, but, you know, not a huge sum). I’m in the process now of trying to figure out how to sign all the documents and get them back to the organization in time. I’m sure it will all work out.

What this means in the short term is that I have plenty of money for all of the things I need for life and research for the rest of my trip. What it means in the medium term is that I don’t have to borrow from next-year’s SSHRC and therefore I don’t have to work during my dissertation phase unless I want to. What it means in the long term is that I am now extra-competitive for academic positions because this is a pretty big deal organization in anthropology that publishes one of the major journals and funds lots of really important research. Having money from them is a statement that they think I have the potential to significantly contribute to the field of anthropology. So, I’m feeling pretty good right now, and also like I better spend the next 7 months busting my ass so I can actually live up to this endorsement.

Filed under:

Comment [5]

[divider]

Some object lessons

11 January 2008, 09:34

Lesson the first is one that every budding anthropologist learns intellectually in class before encountering it in the field. Or I hope they do. But anyway, it is the lesson that the part does not always stand for the whole, or, just because someone grew up in the place/among the people you are studying, does not mean they know everything about that place/those people. Luckily for me, the object lesson was a rather simple one surrounding barnyard animals. I was sure that the animal in the first compound we stayed was a sheep, but John thought it was a goat. I asked a friend, and he said it was a goat (hence my reference to it as a goat a few posts back). Later I said to the woman who owned the animal “a-pon-chin” (which is roughly the phonetic spelling for the word for goat), and she laughed and said something different, which I didn’t catch, which turned out to be the word for “sheep.”

Lesson the second was less humourous, and more embarrassing and irritating. I was in a taxi, and the driver and the passenger pulled a fast one on me, got me to reveal where I kept my money, and stole 15 Ghana Cedis from me. Basically they were insisting that I push a sort of rubber thing around the window that was falling off onto the window. The driver kept saying “no, this way” and ripping it off and then motioning for me to push it again. Then the passenger offered to pay, but didn’t have change, so the driver asked if I had change. I paid for the fair, opening my zippered pocket and revealing where I kept my “walking around” money (thankfully I always keep more significant amounts separately—I had 60 cedis for a new phone in another pocket). Then things got really loud and confusing and upsetting until they stopped and told me to get another cab. When I got to town, I realized that my money was gone.

Since I this happened the woman I’m living with (my African mother… she introduces me as “me ba Kanada” i.e., my Canadian daughter) insists on giving me a ride to and from town whenever our schedules collide. She’s also advised me to use the tro-tro rather than shared taxi, because apparently these types of scams are one of the more common forms of petty crime, and occasionally are rather more dangerous. Since this happen several Ghanaians have confessed that similar things have happened to them (it’s actually the reason that my Ghanaian mother has a car).

The last comment on this blog was my Grandmother worrying about my safety here, so I want to assure people that Ghana is very politically stable right now. There are some problems in the North, exacerbated by poverty and religious differences, but those problems are fairly contained there. As for this experience, it is much like what one can encounter in any large city, again, exacerbated by poverty and the fact that this is a cash-based society. I have learned some valuable lessons about how to stay safe at a fairly low cost: avoid shared taxis, be alert when people are trying to confuse you, and don’t carry more money that you have to. I’ve also gained the sympathy and concern of several Ghanaians, who are helping me find alternatives to shared taxis. So please don’t worry, and certainly don’t drop by this blog on a web search or link-in and take this single event as standing in for Ghana.

Filed under:

Comment [2]

[divider]

You can call me Candidate

7 December 2007, 08:27

So, I passed the proposal defence. At Toronto, this is sort of the equivalent of the comps, which we don’t do. For those of you who don’t know, but are wondering (as opposed to those of you who don’t know, but don’t care, which, trust me, I understand) the process goes like this:

First and start of second year: classes, preliminary fieldwork, external grant applications, start the proposal

Second (and for me) start of third year: focus on proposal (with a few more grant applications). Write draft, revise, revise, revise, revise, revise, polish, polish. Send to six academics of intimidatingly impressive credentials. Wait four weeks for comments.

(In my case I set up the defence for 2 days after the deadline for comments, usually it’s two weeks. This left me with only two sets of comments and one day to write a presentation responding to them. I did that because I have a cheap—relatively speaking—ticket that gets expensive after the 9th, because clvrmnky is coming with me and he has this time off work, and because we want to have a nice Christmas vacation on the beach. So the quick turn around was really mostly my fault.)

I wrote the presentation starting at 9 am and going until 12 am (with breaks for eating, lots of staring at the screen, writing one sentence then erasing it, consultations with a friend about how I was approaching the comments, and about 45 minutes to deal with a minor visa SNAFU that has been resolved). I stayed over at a friend’s place in Toronto so that I would be able to get to the defence in time, and arrived hungry and tired because I could neither eat nor sleep well in the days before.

Then it was two hours of being on the spot. There were 5 academics there, in a semi-circle around me in our department’s new enormous board room. I read my presentation, and then answered their questions. It was gruelling, even though they were mostly kind and encouraging. They (mostly gently) pointed out what felt like major flaws and oversights and asked how I would deal with them, had I thought about them, etc. Some I answered well, some not so much. After two hours I left the room for about 5 minutes and then they came out and said I passed. It was slightly anti-climactic.

So, we are off to Accra on Sunday, and then Kumasi on Tuesday or Wednesday. I will be updating more regularly now that I have (or at least anticipate having) more interesting things to say than “got up, drank coffee, edited proposal, went to bed.” I look forward to hearing from those of you who’ve promised comments, emails, and letters. Everyone’s good wishes and encouragement have helped keep me going through the harder stages of this process, and give me the courage to face a year alone. Thank you.

Filed under:

Comment

[divider]

On looking forward to marking 84 students' short answer exams

29 July 2007, 15:02

I found a bunch of my old midterms the other day. I did really well on midterms in anthropology. This answer earned me full points and a smiley face:

(In answer to “What are Durkheim’s criteria for social facts)

In order to be a social fact, a thing must fit 3 criteria: it must be general, external and have an element of compulsion. That is, it must be observable in multiple individuals, be an idea which was generated outside of those individuals, and be something which those individuals, in some sense, are forced to do. Midterms are excellent examples of social facts.

Now that I’ve marked lots of midterms, I can say with reasonable surety that this is exactly what one should strive for in a short answer. It is coherent, it’s short, it answers the question, it’s short, and it causes the marker to smile (and it’s short).

Did I mention that short answers should be short?

Filed under:

Comment

[divider]

Newer